by Subhash Kateel
This morning, Marissa Alexander was sentenced to 20 years in prison for aggravated assault without an intent to
kill. Although her attorney promises to
appeal, she may still do two decades behind bars for an incident in which no
one was either killed or hurt. This all started after Marissa Alexander was arrested in August 2010 for firing a shot that she claims was a warning shot to repel an abusive husband (Rico Gray) but
prosecutors claim was out of anger and could have harmed two children that were
in the house at the time. I have been following this case since April, talking
to scores of people involved in the case including Marissa’s ex-husband/current
advocate Lincoln Alexander, the lead Prosecutor Angela Corey (who is also the
prosecutor in the Trayvon Martin case), Marissa’s sister Helena Jenkins,
Marissa’s lawyer Kevin Cobbin, and many others.
I haven’t even tried to hide the fact that
very little can convince me that this woman deserves to do twenty years in
prison for hurting no one. But I have
tried, in my radio coverage, and writing (like here and here) on the case, to cite as much of the
evidence available, so that people may make up their own minds. In fact, our show was the first media outlet
to actually cite the statements made by Rico Gray in a damning deposition.
That didn’t stop prosecutor Angel Corey
from telling me on Tuesday that the media (including me) are “riling” people up
and spreading “misinformation.” Well,
let me layout all of the information (most of the interviews are from our last show) that I have so that people will understand
why I keep writing and talking about this case.
Here are the undisputed facts:
*Marissa Alexander is a 31 year old mother
of three who had just given birth to a premature child nine days before her
arrest on charges of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon without intent to
kill after discharging a legally owned firearm in the home jointly owned by her
and her estranged husband at the time, Rico Gray. Rico Gray’s children were present in the
apartment at the time.
*Her husband Rico Gray has an alleged history
of physical abuse that he has alternatively admitted and denied.
*Neither the defense attorney nor the
prosecutors dispute that Marissa Alexander was a likely victim of domestic
violence. However, Angela Corey’s
office argued in a brief that the violence only resulted in “minor bruising”
and never “resulted in serious bodily harm to her.”
*Marissa Alexander fired a shot into the
wall of the apartment that neither killed nor hurt anyone. She claimed the shot was fired in
self-defense, but prosecutors claim it was out of anger.
*Rico Gray called the police (the 911 tape is below) alleging that Marissa fired the gun at him and his children.
*After Marissa’s arrest, Rico Gray gave a
66 page deposition where he admitted
that Marissa did not point the gun at
him or his kids and that he would have “put his hands on her.” It was in this same deposition that we heard
that he put his hand on “all five of his babies’ mamas except one.” He would later retract those statements,
saying that he made them up to protect Marissa Alexander.
*After the initial incident and while out
on bond, Marissa was arrested for an alleged attack on Rico Gray where he
claimed she gave him a black eye and she was taken to the hospital.
Virtually every other fact in the case is
disputed by someone. Here are the
questions in the case, and their answers from the different voices involved.
1. Did
Marissa Alexander fire a warning shot out of fear, or shoot out of anger? Did she aim at Rico and his children?
Angela Corey: “the bullet happened to ricochet up into the ceiling instead of into one of the two children she aimed the gun at… the 911 call backs up the version that she went and got the gun and fired it out of anger, not fear.”Kevin Cobbin: “the shot that was fired went through the wall in an upward direction right into the ceiling…Even Mr. Gray’s own son said that the gun was never pointed at anyone…Ms. Alexander went from having the gun down by her side when she was attacked, she raised it up in the air, flinched because she was afraid that she was going to get hit by him [Rico Gray] and fired one shot and it went straight up in a angular trajectory to the wall into the ceiling.”Rico Gray (911 call)::06-“She just shot at me with her gun…”:46-“She was shooting at me and my son”4:54-“I’m so pissed off right now.”7:12-“She just aimed the gun at us then she shot…well I know she probably wasn’t aiming at my kids…but she might as well be…”
In the deposition: “I was walking toward her because she was telling me to leave the whole time…I was cursing and all that…and she shot in the air one time…(later in deposition)…if my kids weren’t there I probably would have put my hands on her.”
to Politic365blog : “I was begging for my life while my kids were holding on to my side, the gun was pointed at me.”
to Loop21blog : ““When the incident happened, I thought I was going to die in front of my kids that day…She pointed the gun at me…and my kids.”
Many people that have commented on this
case have asked me why, if she aimed and fired the gun at Rico Gray and his
children, she was not charged for a crime other than aggravated assault without
intent to kill? Is it possible to aim a
gun at one (or three) people, fire at them, and not intend to kill them? While lawyers and prosecutors may scoff at the
general public’s naiveté of the legal nuances of the criminal justice system, that scoffing probably won’t make the questions go away.
![]() |
| pic 1 of house and bullet hole |
![]() | |
| pic 2 of house and bullet hole |
2. What about the testimony of the children? Although no transcript of the children’s testimony is publicly available yet, there are court documents that refer to the testimony of both of Rico Gray’s children, who were 9 and 13 at the time :
Angela Corey: “They [Rico and his eldest son] changed their stories and then they changed it back, and the 911 call backs up the version that she went and got the gun and fired a shot out of anger, not out of fear.”One of his sons, who was reportedly “holding on to” Mr. Gray’s side when Marissa fired the shot, testified that he did not see Marissa Alexander fire the gun, and only heard it.The mother of one of Rico Gray’s children testified in court that her son explained to her, “Ms. Alexander did not fire at us, but rather fired in the air because Dad was beating her.”According to Kevin Cobbin, at this point, both children have changed their stories at least once and have at some point corroborated Marissa Alexander’s story.
3. Is
Rico Gray a credible eyewitness? The
most controversial figure in this case is Marissa’s husband Rico Gray. It is really hard not to question his
credibility given his changing statements and his alleged history of
violence. But there are differing
opinions:
Angela Corey regarding Rico Gray’s history of violence: “Not all of that is relevant, his reputation for violence is relevant but…we have rules of evidence that limit the way that evidence can come in.”Chartrissia Anderson (former partner of Rico Gray) : “I’ve been hit in the mouth, pushed into walls, he’s run me into neighbor’s homes, he’s beaten me…outside to where I have been stripped of my clothing…The last time…he hit me in my mouth. I went into my sons room to call the police and he started to yank the cord out of the wall. Once he realized the call had went through, he ran into our kitchen…pulled out a fork…took the fork, stood in front of his son …and started stabbing himself…and told his son [the same youngest son that testified in Marissa Alexander’s case] to tell the police…that I [Chartrissia] had done it.”Kevin Cobbin: “Mr. Gray has gotten very good at knowing how to play the system. And a lot of these men, who abuse women, are very good. They know, ‘if I punch her in the face she is gonna have a mark. But if I punch her in the head…back…stomach, it won’t be visible.”
4. Is
Rico Gray a victim too? When speaking to
Loop21 and Politic365, Rico Gray has intimated that he has been a victim of
domestic violence as well, citing an incident after Marissa Alexander’s arrest
where she allegedly gave him a black eye.
That incident was probably the most damaging claim made against
Marissa’s credibility.
Angela Corey: “What do you make of a woman who claims she is so afraid of him that she had to fire a gun at him, and then despite a judge's order while she is out on bond for these charges, goes back over there and hits him, gives him a black eye and goes to jail for it?”Kevin Cobbin: “My client went over to that house because she had to get a birth certificate signed, her child was born premature and was about to be cut off of health insurance…when she gets over there, he wants her to stay, she says no…and he jumps on her again that day. The police came and took her to the hospital, they didn’t take him to the hospital.”
Well, there is the police report and the hospital record.
5. Why
didn’t Marissa Alexander take a plea?
Angela Corey: “we offered her a plea deal [three years] that she turned down because she thought she would have better luck with the jury.”Kevin Cobbin: “My client has maintained her innocence from the first day I met her until today. Her story has remained the same; it has been backed up. Why should someone that’s innocent, who has done nothing wrong but defend themselves, why should they take any day in prison?”Rico Gray: “Personally, I wish she would have taken the three years…”What troubles me the most about the conversations on the plea deal is that, at times, it seems that Ms. Alexander is being punished for not taking a plea. Also, as a domestic violence survivor told me, “when looking at a mother of three, spending three years in prison does not feel like a deal for a crime in which you have no prior record, you neither killed nor hurt anyone, and you would be spending three times more time behind bars for hurting no one than Rico Gray would face for his domestic battery (of Chartrissia Anderson) sentence in 2006, for which he received probation.”
While I do not believe people should go
around discharging firearms, especially in homes, I cannot look at the evidence that has been
made public and say that Marissa Alexander deserves to be in jail. As the spouse of a former domestic violence
advocate, I cannot say that “minor bruising” is not enough to make a victim of
domestic violence afraid for their life.
As a human being, I can say that it is important to defend people’s rights
to no longer be victims. There are many
victims in this case, Marissa Alexander, her kids, Rico Gray’s kids, the
families of everyone involved. But if
Ms. Alexander truly watches her kids grow up while she is behind bars, the true
victim in this case will be justice.
I leave you with her words at sentencing:
"I want to address my children, you're your mothers daughter. You're strong, you are black and you are beautiful and whenever you need me don't think the distance should keep you away from me, okay? Cause I'll be here for you sooner than you think. You, you are your father's son, you have wisdom about yourself. Rihanna Gray, last time I saw you, you were 7 months and now your 22 months. I breast fed you and spent hours with you. My love is here without seeing you or not and I know that angels are watching over you and one thing I pray is that my heartbeat beats once w/ yours so that we are all in unison. I want to address my Gray children, in the short time I got to know you , you meant a lot to me as well. I encourage you all to not let this situation impact you in a way and I will continue to pray for you all and I know that you'll be okay. I am simply a woman who loved a man very much, I got no apologies, I have nothing else to say."
"I want to address my children, you're your mothers daughter. You're strong, you are black and you are beautiful and whenever you need me don't think the distance should keep you away from me, okay? Cause I'll be here for you sooner than you think. You, you are your father's son, you have wisdom about yourself. Rihanna Gray, last time I saw you, you were 7 months and now your 22 months. I breast fed you and spent hours with you. My love is here without seeing you or not and I know that angels are watching over you and one thing I pray is that my heartbeat beats once w/ yours so that we are all in unison. I want to address my Gray children, in the short time I got to know you , you meant a lot to me as well. I encourage you all to not let this situation impact you in a way and I will continue to pray for you all and I know that you'll be okay. I am simply a woman who loved a man very much, I got no apologies, I have nothing else to say."



HER AIM NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED!
ReplyDeleteAmen! After 33 years in an abusive marriage, I am saying NO MORE! Afraid to turn the vacuum on without requesting permission to do so. WoW THAT WAS ME TODAY! I am free for the first time in many years. Yet, mentally I am imprisoned. I turned it on without asking and it was wonderful. Unless you have been abused, back off. So sorry the JUSTICE SYSTEM is the one abusing this VICTIM for the next 20 years. Disgraceful!
DeleteHere is the problem: the law is pretty clear on this. While people can sit here and say that she should have actually shot him, or that she is innocent because of the abuse, the law does not agree. Was she a victim? Yes. Was she THE victim? No. Here's a few facts that people might not be aware of or pay attention to:
ReplyDelete-She MARRIED Gray less than a year before the incident. She had previously had a restraining order placed against him in 2006 following his conviction of domestic violence against another woman. However, she since then had a relationship with him and had a baby with him. If she felt herself a victim, why did she marry him, or even continue a relationship with him?
-According to her, Gray was trying to stop her from leaving, yet she got to the garage without him. While the main garage door was supposedly stuck, she did not try to leave through the other door to the outside. Instead, while not currently defending herself, she got a gun and walked back into the house. This actually ruined her "Stand Your Ground" defense, since that law allows for the prevention of a crime either being committed, or about to be committed. As she is the one who re-initiated the confrontation, she is at fault for it.
-She was advised by her lawyers initially to claim self defense under the abused spouse laws. She instead decided to go for the "Stand Your Ground" law. If she felt she was an abused spouse, and that she was defending herself as an abused spouse, why did she not choose that defense?
-She was arrested for domestic violence after this arrest. If you read the police report (which counts as evidence), there are a few items that damage her character. The officer states that when he first talked to her on the phone, she stated she had an alibi. However, she later says that she WAS there. When you start off with a lie, it never goes well. When she said that she was the one hit, he inspected the areas she claimed to be injured. However, he was unable to find evidence of injury to those areas. She later claims to feel lightheaded after she is arrested and is on her way to the jail. When she becomes unresponsive, two emergency units are dispatched. They report that her vitals are fine. The officer notes that there is now a small cut under her eye that was not there when she was first put into the car. This statement is verified by the other officer that is present at the interview.
The point here is that her character is in question. Remember that being A victim does not make you innocent of crimes. The law is what it is, and the evidence supports that she committed a crime.
(cont 1/3)
Let's look at the crime she is charged with:
ReplyDelete"Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon without intent to kill after discharging a legally owned firearm in the home jointly owned by her and her estranged husband at the time, Rico Gray. Rico Gray’s children were present in the apartment at the time."
She is charged with three (3) counts of the above. Why? It's simple numbers: there were three people in the house besides her.
To quote the article above: "Many people that have commented on this case have asked me why, if she aimed and fired the gun at Rico Gray and his children, she was not charged for a crime other than aggravated assault without intent to kill? Is it possible to aim a gun at one (or three) people, fire at them, and not intend to kill them?"
The answer to that is very simple, and comes with a basic understanding of Florida law. In Florida statute 784.011:
Assault.—
(1) An “assault” is an intentional, unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another, coupled with an apparent ability to do so, and doing some act which creates a well-founded fear in such other person that such violence is imminent.
So, it qualifies as assault WITHOUT intent to kill not because she tried to kill them, but rather because she threatened them with violence through word or act (firing a warning shot counts as a threatening act).
Why aggravated assault? In Florida statute 784.021:
Aggravated assault.—
(1) An “aggravated assault” is an assault:
(a) With a deadly weapon without intent to kill;
Notice the parts about DEADLY WEAPON and WITHOUT INTENT TO KILL. By Florida law, Alexander had to be charged with Aggravated Assault (the parts of with a deadly weapon and without intent to kill are implied by the law itself).
(cont 2/3)
Now, why the harsh sentence? Again, we have to go back to understanding Florida law. In Florida statute 775.087 (known as the 10-20-Life statute):
ReplyDelete2. Any person who is convicted of a felony or an attempt to commit a felony listed in sub-subparagraphs (a)1.a.-q., regardless of whether the use of a weapon is an element of the felony, and during the course of the commission of the felony such person discharged a “firearm” or “destructive device” as defined in s. 790.001 shall be sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment of 20 years. [note: aggravated assault is sub-subparagraph (a)1.f.]
This means there is no choice in a guilty verdict but to sentence for at least 20 years.
Is domestic violence a horrible fact? Yes. Was she a victim of domestic violence? The evidence says that she was. However, while no one should have to go through that, it does not automatically clear you of any crimes you commit.
And before everyone gets up in arms: I am also a victim of domestic violence. This is NOT a shot against domestic violence of domestic violence. However, we should not advocate a return of violence. We should NOT advocate someone knowingly getting into a relationship with someone who commits domestic violence.
Finally, we need to recognize and understand that there IS a problem with the laws. THAT is what people need to be up in arms about. Let's work to make better laws. Let's work to force the public (and politicians) to recognize the true damage of domestic violence, and take a stand to end it.
(end 3/3)
Well said anonymous. I see it from a different perspective for the first time.
DeleteFIRST OF ALL - you are 100% WRONG.
DeleteIt doesn't matter what the law says, you never heard of JURY NULLIFICATION??? There is ALWAYS a choice. I agree mandatory minimum laws are HEINOUS and go against everything I believe in though. Knowing this, juries need to start acquitting if the person will be sentenced under mandatory minimum as part of JURY NULLIFICATION.
YOUR QUOTE:
So, it qualifies as assault WITHOUT intent to kill not because she tried to kill them, but rather because she threatened them with violence through word or act (firing a warning shot counts as a threatening act). SHE WAS NOT THREATENING HER CHILDREN, they were just 'there' - and I don't believe it was a 'threat' towards him, I believe it was more of a 'look here, you're not gonna choke me and beat me this time' YOU SAID THEY WERE ESTRANGED, then that wasn't his house, it was hers, right? Maybe she went back in BECAUSE her kids were in there - maybe that's why she didn't leave -
Also that CRAP 10-20-life law, are you telling me that pulling or shooting a gun during the commission of a felony counts EVEN IF THE ACT of having the GUN IS THE FELONY? If that is true, that is OUTRAGEOUS.
I thought laws like that were to ensure tough sentencing on armed robbers.
I thought aggravated assault should include physical injuries.
The laws DEFINITELY need to be changed, but, like I said, JURY NULLIFICATION - I WOULD NEVER SEND THIS LADY TO JAIL FOR 20 YEARS NO PAROLE because she fired a single bullet into a WALL as a 'show of force' so this man would just leave.
Everybody keeps saying SHE COULD HAVE JUST LEFT, I thought thats what stand your ground was all about - why SHOULD you - it was HER FUCKING HOUSE ANYWAY
Bun bun for life are you really that stupid? Those were not her kids. They were his and the home was jointly owned by them both.
DeleteSO, Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteFirst, I call bullshit on your claim to be a "victim" of domestic violence. I think it is something you put in their to validate your garbage statements. Two, if you paid attention to the whole article, you would see that all three eyewitnesses have changed their claims (two being children of Rico Gray) and you would see that Rico Gray not only has a DV history, but a history of hiding evidence. If you read Rico Gray in those articles, he changes his claim in between articles.Now, I will, when I have time, go back and refute your "I am likely a prosecutor" analysis. But I will let you think abot the simplest things first.
Yeah that guy is a total slimeball. Getting her arrested a second time is typical abuser tactic, I bet he feels so damn smug right now. He's a loser and is just a nasty awful person.
DeleteI too call BS on the "victim" of domestic violence thing. If this were true, you would know that abusers are very manipulative and women in domestic violence situations return to their abusers numerous times before a.) getting sick of the abuse or b.) getting killed.
ReplyDeleteYeah, that guys sounds like a prosecutor to me. It is probably Angela Corey herself
ReplyDeleteHow could this not be viewed as a warning shot (which would eliminate the assault charge). She missed him at point blank range and SHE DIDN'T FIRE AGAIN!!! How is that not a warning shot???
ReplyDeleteAnonymous makes some very valid points that you all don't want to accept. I also agree that Anonymous probably ISN'T a victim of domestic violence. But that opinion doesn't make their point any less valid. I understand that you are passionate about this woman's sentence and the fact that she was abused. But she didn't appear to be abused on the day in question. It appears as if they got into an argument and she had a chance to leave and take herself away from the danger. I'm sorry but unless someone has a weapon or is beating you to death, you can't justify shooting a gun when children are around. If you look at the Grio.com version of the story, there are pictures of Rico's eye (swollen and bloody) when she allegedly hit him in the incident that followed the shooting. And she pled no contest for that incident. And that's really what did her in. She had no logical reason to even go near Rico after the first incident. They both had restraining orders against each other.
ReplyDeleteThey both seem to be toxic for and toward each other. But when you pull out a gun and shoot that gun near a 9 and 13 year old and your life isn't endangered, you're going to be found guilty. Grio.com says it took the jury 13 minutes to decide that case. They must've agreed with Angela Corey.
She definitely doesn't deserve 20 years. But that's not Angela Corey fault not is it her job. The mandatory minimum is the cause for the sentence. Remember Plaxico Burress? He got 3 years in jail just because his gun went off in the club. He shot HIMSELF. The judge cited that the bullet could've KILLED ANYONE in the building. I believe Angela Corey (after she saw the evidence) felt the same way about those boys.
I feel bad for everyone involved here. The boys, Marrissa, and Rico. They are all some broken individuals who need healing. But you can't claim "Stand Your Ground" and your life isn't in danger and let off a shot.
20 years with no parole? No previous criminal history? A gross loser of a man who admits to abusing "4 out of his 5 babies mama's" (eye roll) THAT IS INSANITY - she didn't hurt anybody, she is not a robber, she is not a rapist, a killer, a drug dealer, a child abuser - she is and was a frightened woman who had been experiencing abuse.
ReplyDeleteALSO I thought the 10-20-life laws were specifically indicated for people who were ALREADY IN THE PROCESS OF PERPETRATING A CRIME, such as A ROBBERY - so if you PULL a gun during the COMMISSION OF A CRIME you get a harsher & guaranteed sentence.
What CRIME was she in the process of committing? Somebody tell me that...how do you get charged with AGGRAVATED ASSAULT when NOBODY IS HURT ! What about INTENT ??
Also, at DEUCE above me, how do YOU know her life wasn't in danger?? He told her he was going to kill her!! She's a tiny woman and he is a big man, a man doesn't need a weapon to kill a thin woman! She didn't SHOOT HIM or shoot at him, she shot into the wall as a warning. Maybe she was negligent but she is NOT guilty of aggravated assault and she was NOT in the process of committing another crime.
THESE MANDATORY LAWS ARE BULL, they are wrong, and aren't our prisons FULL ENOUGH??
This is AWFUL.
And quit saying 'when your life isn't endangered' I'm sick of hearing that, obviously you've never been abused or in real fear for your life...we know when we see that dead look in our abusers eyes, that they DEFINITELY are capable of killing us, it's SCARY !!